As I said above we should off course “…take all reasonable and responsible steps to protect us against it”. But we do not do all we can do to stop all evil in the world (and yes, drunk drivers that kill people are evil too) – we prioritize. Thats fair enough. I just don’t think priorities are right now and I do think they are based to much on fear – not just on fear, but too much.

> Could it be that we simply adapt to the world we live in?

It’s not about adaption. If it was we would put much more restrictions on all the evil that really do kill us – not the one threat that actually kill very few (not that its not wrong no matter how many it is)

> Do you really think that it makes no difference whether people are killed in an accident or murdered in someones fascist political struggle?

If one of my kids was killed because someone else made an egocentric, stupid and illegal decission I would not care if it was terrorism or a drunk driver. I would get equally mad at the ones that did it.

But my point is just that its is far more likely that one of my kids get hit by a car than being shot down by terrorists on their way on vacation. Far more likely! So to protect my kids the best it would make more sense to do more to stop car accidents than to stop terrorism. Again, I am not saying we should not have any security – not at all. I just think that a lot of the restrictions we have now are show-offs rather that real improved security.

Anyway, no matter how you spin it the fact is that travelling has become much more of a nightmare. And I just don’t think thats good

Could it be that we simply adapt to the world we live in?

Do you really think that it makes no difference whether people are killed in an accident or murdered in someones fascist political struggle?