<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PageRank is a Brand – Not a Technology!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.demib.com/pagerank-brand-technology.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.demib.com/pagerank-brand-technology.html#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=pagerank-brand-technology</link>
	<description>Search Engine Evangelist, SEO Book Author &#38; Serial Entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 09:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Forsman</title>
		<link>http://blog.demib.com/pagerank-brand-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Forsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demib.com/?p=610#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Great and interesting post. It would make more sense if Google really could present their decision how they will handle the pagerank issue, instead of doing this split ways as you say. It brings a message of &quot;we havnt made up our mind yet&quot;.

so when do you recon that we really would see the ewnd of pagerank?

btw nice meeting you at smx in sthlm the other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great and interesting post. It would make more sense if Google really could present their decision how they will handle the pagerank issue, instead of doing this split ways as you say. It brings a message of &#8220;we havnt made up our mind yet&#8221;.</p>
<p>so when do you recon that we really would see the ewnd of pagerank?</p>
<p>btw nice meeting you at smx in sthlm the other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netzwerkkommunikation &#187; Blogschau: Ade Google Pagerank</title>
		<link>http://blog.demib.com/pagerank-brand-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Netzwerkkommunikation &#187; Blogschau: Ade Google Pagerank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demib.com/?p=610#comment-254</guid>
		<description>[...] Etwas ernster beschäftigt sich Mikkel mit dem Thema und meint, dass die Branche auch ganz gut ohne Pagerank auskommen wird / soll: &#8220;PageRank is a brand more than a technology today.&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Etwas ernster beschäftigt sich Mikkel mit dem Thema und meint, dass die Branche auch ganz gut ohne Pagerank auskommen wird / soll: &#8220;PageRank is a brand more than a technology today.&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
