<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paid links should also count in search engines!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.demib.com/paid-links.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.demib.com/paid-links.html</link>
	<description>Search Engine Evangelist, SEO Book Author &#38; Serial Entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: activetraffic SEO</title>
		<link>http://blog.demib.com/paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>activetraffic SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demib.com/?p=428#comment-131</guid>
		<description>there is no way, google can track und verify paid links. the only method for google to be able to see paid-links is the nofollow-tag, which they strongly recommend! Unless you´re not stupid to headline your external links with &quot;these links can be bought&quot; and in the same time a quality rater will recognize it, google won´t be able to determine paid links. It´s basically the same as &quot;oldschool&quot; linkexchange, not link against link, but link gainst money (without having to deal with reciprocal issues, sattelite pages etc.)! ;-)

I strongly believe, that even nofollow links do affect rankings. If I would be google I´d see these as a positive factor. A siteowner who pays for links, must also have at least a good usability on his site in order to sell properly to keep ROI positive! This can be a sign for quality sites, which google wants to deliver as search results in the end!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is no way, google can track und verify paid links. the only method for google to be able to see paid-links is the nofollow-tag, which they strongly recommend! Unless you´re not stupid to headline your external links with &#8220;these links can be bought&#8221; and in the same time a quality rater will recognize it, google won´t be able to determine paid links. It´s basically the same as &#8220;oldschool&#8221; linkexchange, not link against link, but link gainst money (without having to deal with reciprocal issues, sattelite pages etc.)! <img src='http://blog.demib.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I strongly believe, that even nofollow links do affect rankings. If I would be google I´d see these as a positive factor. A siteowner who pays for links, must also have at least a good usability on his site in order to sell properly to keep ROI positive! This can be a sign for quality sites, which google wants to deliver as search results in the end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; SEO - Takes a minute to learn, but a lifetime to master &#124; seoFM - der erste deutsche PodCast für SEOs und Online-Marketer</title>
		<link>http://blog.demib.com/paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; SEO - Takes a minute to learn, but a lifetime to master &#124; seoFM - der erste deutsche PodCast für SEOs und Online-Marketer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demib.com/?p=428#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] Auch bezahlte Links sollten gewertet werden - Gute Argumentation von Mikkel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Auch bezahlte Links sollten gewertet werden &#8211; Gute Argumentation von Mikkel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikkel deMib Svendsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.demib.com/paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikkel deMib Svendsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demib.com/?p=428#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Lars, the timeout sounds bad. I guess I will have to have some real geeks check the servers :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lars, the timeout sounds bad. I guess I will have to have some real geeks check the servers <img src='http://blog.demib.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FelixtheK</title>
		<link>http://blog.demib.com/paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>FelixtheK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demib.com/?p=428#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I totally agree... especially in the european searchmarket where linkbaiting for commercial websites can be really hard - paid links should count. Most webmasters dont link to commercial sites with follow even when they are extremly relevant. Those times are over. My theory: If google would find a way to totally detect and devalue paid links - the SERPS would suck ASS! Even really good content needs a little paid linklove sometimes.

But I think Google knows that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree&#8230; especially in the european searchmarket where linkbaiting for commercial websites can be really hard &#8211; paid links should count. Most webmasters dont link to commercial sites with follow even when they are extremly relevant. Those times are over. My theory: If google would find a way to totally detect and devalue paid links &#8211; the SERPS would suck ASS! Even really good content needs a little paid linklove sometimes.</p>
<p>But I think Google knows that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Bo Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.demib.com/paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Bo Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demib.com/?p=428#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Nice thinking, but if they get a value couldn&#039;t that be dangerous? Wouldn&#039;t people (big company&#039;s) just go crazy bying links?

At first i couldn&#039;t open this blog post due to a timeout:

Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in C:\Websites\Blog.demib.com\wp-content\plugins\enhanced-wordpress-contactform\wp-contactform.php on line 277</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice thinking, but if they get a value couldn&#8217;t that be dangerous? Wouldn&#8217;t people (big company&#8217;s) just go crazy bying links?</p>
<p>At first i couldn&#8217;t open this blog post due to a timeout:</p>
<p>Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in C:\Websites\Blog.demib.com\wp-content\plugins\enhanced-wordpress-contactform\wp-contactform.php on line 277</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

